By a mere chance did I stumble upon a very interesting book. It is written by Syed Manzurul Islam and called The Ethics of Travel. From Marco Pollo to Kafka. (Link to Amazon.)
It is amazing how things sometimes converge unexpectedly. While my primary subject of study is postmodern philosophy, the advent of electronic mediation (no mass media, please) and aspects of living in all this mess, my (secondary) target of interest is the religion of Islam (strictly academic, no flame).
I have been wondering for some time, how to conjoin these two fields that seem not to carry an implicit correlation. Iqbal’s Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam (update: English original here) looked like a good start, though his work is of course confined to the era of 1920’s and 1930’s.
The Ethics of Travel have it both: postmodern philosophy in the subject (quoting mainly from Deleuze and others) and Islam in author’s name. (Well, not that it really mattered, but hey, nice coincidence!) There are even references to my favourite writer, Rushdie, and to Lévinas – at the right spots, just where the names struck my mind while reading.
As soon as I finish an urgent work, I’ll start the translation. The English here is quite exceptional and challenging (just as English of Indian/Pakistani immigrants usually is).
I should also add that I was able to acquire this book thanks to a swift intercontinental cooperation of Blake of the Montana Book Company. Since Amazon blatantly ignores our recent EU accession and disallows Payments from our country, why not contact the used books sellers directly (the book being kind of rare). A nice workaround.
¿#@%‼?
However, as your “second target of interest is the religion of Islam (strictly academic, no flame)”, you might, or might not? answer the following question: why did the islamic world not at all condemn the barbarian slaughter of Nicholas Berg? While the western world is so much concerned about Abu Ghraib.
Both tragedies are not comparable. Still the islamic world, did not show any respect to Nicholas Berg.
A tragedy by itself. A religion, which lost its religion.
A.
On the other hand, the Berg’s murder was carried out by a few individuals who represent neither Islam nor Muslim world, and would be probably condemned by most educated/religious Muslims anyway.
You ask why didn’t they say so? After September 11, somebody here in Prague broke the windows of a peaceful bookshop run by a longtime Syrian expat (also selling Islamic/Muslim literature). Would you want the Christian church to apologize for this unfortunate event and condemn the ‘Christian’ who did it? (I’m exaggerating, but the principle is the same.) I have updated the article to link to Iqbal's English original text.
looking from the west to the east, i see daily killing and murdering among muslim people – from sudan to saudi arabia. i see muslim human bombs in israel.
i do not see western people killing muslim people on purpose – apart from isreals actions in revenge (bad enough though).
we in the west, often try to find excuses for what is happening in the east. as you wrote: “the Berg’s murder was carried out by a few individuals who represent neither Islam nor Muslim world”. how do you know? i maintain, they well do represent the muslim world of today to a broad extend. Otherwise some muslim represantatives would have condemned N. Burgs slaughter. But that did not happen – as far as i got to know.
However, didn´t i come here for some other reasons? than discussing cultural issues?...:-) ja Iqbal…
But I’m afraid this very affair was not really a deliberate act in the name of God, but merely a blind act of revenge, boosted by adrenaline, feeling of ‘solidarity’ and a mix of mangled ideas.
Iqbal gibt es jetzt auch auf Deutch, bei Verlag Hans Schiler kann man Die Wiederbelebung des religiösen Denkens im Islam bestellen. (Die beiden Übersetzer kenne ich auch.)
don´t get me wrong. i don´t mistake a few misled individuals…and i don´t condemn the complete muslim world. nevertheless taking off my very liberal western sungalsses i had to notice, its not just a ‘few’ sharing the N. Bergs murderers ‘Weltanschauung’. There are just too many crimes committed in the name of the one and only God.
Thx for the link to Schilling. I will have a look.
a.
Hmm….I think you’ll find that the numbers of Palestinian dead far exceed the Israeli figures – so it could just as well be argued that the Palestinian motivation is revenge. More significantly, the West were bombing Iraq for 10 years prior to last years invasion. Just because you don’t see the killings in the media doesn’t mean they haven’t been taking place…
“When asked on US television if she [Madeline Albright, US Secretary of State] thought that the death of half a million Iraqi children [from sanctions in Iraq] was a price worth paying, Albright replied: “This is a very hard choice, but we think the price is worth it.”
John Pilger : http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,232986,00.html
http://www.palestinereport.org/
http://www.juancole.com/
Here he lists condemnations of Berg’s killing:
http://www.uga.edu/islam/beheading_berg.html
i have not been here since my last posting.
This is a very interesting discussion. Nice to see that Tom and Nardo did reply.
Well i did not change my mind, which happens on and off :)
all the best
Andra
ps hope the baby is doing fine!
commenting closed for this article